PlasmaCCP electric-field magnitude |E| field map — the axisymmetric solution unfolded to a full-diameter section (r −230..230 mm, z 0–70 mm), the field concentrating in the sheath under the powered electrode and at the electrode edge
|E| field map · 300 mm PECVD baseline (3 Torr · 13.56 MHz · 500 W)

Trend simulator for RF CCP chambers

PlasmaCCPSee the plasma before you open the chamber

Sketch a chamber, hit run, and read the field, density, sheath and gas flow a few seconds later — cheap enough to test an idea before you book chamber time.

No account, no card. A guest run is solved in your browser, so the chamber geometry never leaves it.

~2 sfull solve
M1-M8CI benchmarks
V1-V10literature anchors
24presets
PlasmaCCP electric-field magnitude |E| field map — the axisymmetric solution unfolded to a full-diameter section (r −230..230 mm, z 0–70 mm), the field concentrating in the sheath under the powered electrode and at the electrode edge
|E| field map · 300 mm PECVD baseline (3 Torr · 13.56 MHz · 500 W)

Three questions worth answering first

The ones a screening run can actually settle.

Where does the field pile up?

Electrode corners, dielectric joints, the sheath edge — see which ones move when you change the geometry.

How does it change across the wafer?

Ion flux and ion energy along the wafer radius, so you can tell edge-heavy from center-heavy.

How much of it should you trust?

The validated range, the warnings and the model's limits sit next to the numbers, not in a footnote.

Start from a chamber that looks like yours

24 process presets ship with the simulator — these six cover the common families, and every card is an actual solve of that preset.

Your geometry never reaches our servers

If you've dropped this kind of screening because the chamber cross-section can't leave the fab, that isn't a problem here.

  • Guest runs solve in your browserThe solver is compiled to WebAssembly and runs on your machine. Nothing is solved on ours.
  • The geometry is not sentA guest's only request carries 24 scalars for the judgment step. No shapes, no mesh, no snapshot.
  • Nothing is keptA guest run leaves no history entry. Close the tab and it's gone.
  • Signing in changes that, deliberatelyRun history and saved geometries need the snapshot on your account. If you'd rather not, stay a guest — everything still runs.

Three steps, that's it

Draw → Run → See.

  1. Draw

    Sketch the chamber, or start from one of the presets.

  2. Run

    One click. The reduced-fluid solver converges in a few seconds.

  3. See

    Read the maps side by side and decide what to change next.

Setup, results and validation in one place

The inputs you ran, the maps they produced, and how far they've been checked — no second tool to open.

300 mm baseline · process overview
Fresh result
SolverConverged
ValidityWithin range
ModelTrend-level
Mesh200 × 176 FV
Residual3.70e-9
RF phase · Not computedWarnings · 0 blocking / 1 notes
Electron temperature (0D model)
1.83 eV

Wafer-facing plasma volume

Mean sheath thickness
1.7 mm

Powered-electrode RF mean

Absorbed RF power100.0%
500 W

of 500 W applied

The results view itself, not a screenshot. The numbers come from a real solve of the baseline preset.
2D field maps

Render |E|, electron density, and temperature straight onto the chamber cross-section.

RF phase animationPro

Replay how the sheath and fields breathe over a single RF cycle.

Gas flow & current streamlines

Trace neutral-gas flow and current paths as streamlines.

Parameter sweepsPro

Sweep power, pressure, gap, or frequency at once to map sensitivity curves.

A/B comparePro

Place two runs side by side and isolate the effect of a single change.

Geometry library

Version your saved chambers and pick up any run where you left off.

Grounded in the literature

We publish where we're wrong

We ran an independent code (Zapdos/MOOSE) against ours and published the result either way — our sheath came out 2.8× too thin, and we left the number in.

10literature anchors (V1–V10)
8CI benchmarks (M1–M8)
3,200+automated tests
~2 sfull solve
  • Olthoff & Greenberg 1995 — GEC reference cell
  • Lieberman & Lichtenberg — global model
  • Turner 2013 — PIC benchmark
See what we don't claim →

One run is never the answer

An engineering call is always A versus B. Wider electrode, tighter gap, different focus ring — these tools exist to make that comparison directly.

All of these need an account; the three marked Pro open on the paid plan. Single runs stay free with no account.

Pricing

The Free plan is fully usable today. Pro adds the sweep, A/B compare, and split-test workflows plus a higher mesh ceiling — paid checkout is not open yet.

Free

$0available now

  • Solver runs + every static field map
  • Every process preset and baseline
  • Save 20 private geometries · 30 runs of history
  • Standard mesh up to 48k cells
Get started free

Run your first chamber now

PlasmaCCP is a reduced fluid model built for fast trend screening. Results are directional signals — confirm findings with experiments or high-fidelity simulation before sign-off. Read validation and references.